https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274110 Review jurisdiction under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC is confined to statutory grounds such as discovery of new matter, mistake, or an error apparent on the face of the record; it cannot be used to reargue the matter or substitute a rehearing in appeal. An alleged error requiring detailed reasoning falls outside review. The Court also reiterated that review petitions must be disposed of promptly, and prolonged pendency of a review petition is not a valid justification for delaying a special leave petition. On that basis, the Court declined interference and dismissed the special leave petition. en-us Fri, 03 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 29 Jul 2018 11:40:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274110 Review jurisdiction under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC is confined to statutory grounds such as discovery of new matter, mistake, or an error apparent on the face of the record; it cannot be used to reargue the matter or substitute a rehearing in appeal. An alleged error requiring detailed reasoning falls outside review. The Court also reiterated that review petitions must be disposed of promptly, and prolonged pendency of a review petition is not a valid justification for delaying a special leave petition. On that basis, the Court declined interference and dismissed the special leave petition. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 03 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274110