<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 1194 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274103</link>
    <description>The appeal contested the Tribunal&#039;s decision allowing the Assessee&#039;s claim on unexplained foreign exchange forward contract loss for the Assessment year 2008-09. The Appellant argued the loss was notional and should not be considered as stock in trade, as foreign currency trading was not the Assessee&#039;s primary business. The Respondent, citing a Supreme Court judgment, supported the Tribunal&#039;s decision, stating losses from foreign exchange fluctuations in derivatives were deductible under Section 37(1) of the Act. The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, finding no error and dismissing the appeal without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2018 11:40:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=528554" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 1194 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274103</link>
      <description>The appeal contested the Tribunal&#039;s decision allowing the Assessee&#039;s claim on unexplained foreign exchange forward contract loss for the Assessment year 2008-09. The Appellant argued the loss was notional and should not be considered as stock in trade, as foreign currency trading was not the Assessee&#039;s primary business. The Respondent, citing a Supreme Court judgment, supported the Tribunal&#039;s decision, stating losses from foreign exchange fluctuations in derivatives were deductible under Section 37(1) of the Act. The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, finding no error and dismissing the appeal without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274103</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>