<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (7) TMI 1195 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274104</link>
    <description>The court confirmed that the Assessee-Society&#039;s income application for the relevant year exceeded 85%, meeting the requirement of Section 11(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Consequently, the Assessee was not denied exemption, and the court upheld the ITAT&#039;s order from 30th May, 2016. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the ITAT&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2018 11:40:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=528553" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (7) TMI 1195 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274104</link>
      <description>The court confirmed that the Assessee-Society&#039;s income application for the relevant year exceeded 85%, meeting the requirement of Section 11(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Consequently, the Assessee was not denied exemption, and the court upheld the ITAT&#039;s order from 30th May, 2016. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the ITAT&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274104</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>