<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (7) TMI 7 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13851</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the assessee&#039;s claim for weighted deduction under section 35B(1)(b)(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for laboratory expenses incurred in India was not allowable. The court ruled that expenses for analysis of goods exported within the country did not qualify for the deduction under the specified provision. Emphasizing the need for expenditure outside India to be considered for the benefit, the court concluded in favor of the Revenue, stating that the Tribunal erred in granting the deduction for expenses incurred domestically. The judgment clarified the criteria for claiming the deduction and highlighted the distinction between expenses incurred domestically and abroad for eligibility.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 12:45:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=52852" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (7) TMI 7 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13851</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the assessee&#039;s claim for weighted deduction under section 35B(1)(b)(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 for laboratory expenses incurred in India was not allowable. The court ruled that expenses for analysis of goods exported within the country did not qualify for the deduction under the specified provision. Emphasizing the need for expenditure outside India to be considered for the benefit, the court concluded in favor of the Revenue, stating that the Tribunal erred in granting the deduction for expenses incurred domestically. The judgment clarified the criteria for claiming the deduction and highlighted the distinction between expenses incurred domestically and abroad for eligibility.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13851</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>