https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274083 Sale of adulterated curd under the Prevention of Food Adulteration law was upheld where concurrent findings and analyst reports established deficiency in milk fat and non-fat milk solids. The challenge based on alleged non-compliance with Rules 4(3) and 4(4) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules failed because the record showed compliance and no specific defect in sampling was proved. A plea for sentence reduction based on lapse of time and the shop owner's death was rejected because the statutory minimum sentence remained mandatory once the offence was proved. en-us Mon, 27 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 27 Jul 2018 11:28:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274083 Sale of adulterated curd under the Prevention of Food Adulteration law was upheld where concurrent findings and analyst reports established deficiency in milk fat and non-fat milk solids. The challenge based on alleged non-compliance with Rules 4(3) and 4(4) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules failed because the record showed compliance and no specific defect in sampling was proved. A plea for sentence reduction based on lapse of time and the shop owner's death was rejected because the statutory minimum sentence remained mandatory once the offence was proved. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 27 Jul 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274083