<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 1671 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274074</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, directing the exclusion of investments capable of earning taxable income from the disallowance calculation under Rule 8D(2)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The decision emphasized that investments generating taxable income should not be considered in the disallowance computation under section 14A, maintaining consistency with a previous ruling in the appellant&#039;s own case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2018 10:42:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=528443" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 1671 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274074</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, directing the exclusion of investments capable of earning taxable income from the disallowance calculation under Rule 8D(2)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The decision emphasized that investments generating taxable income should not be considered in the disallowance computation under section 14A, maintaining consistency with a previous ruling in the appellant&#039;s own case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274074</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>