<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 1679 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364371</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal in favor of the Revenue. The appellant was required to segregate and reverse the credit attributable to trading activities. The extended period of limitation was deemed applicable due to the appellant&#039;s awareness and actions regarding non-taxable trading activities, justifying the proportionate turnover method for calculating credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Jan 2020 12:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=528412" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 1679 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364371</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal in favor of the Revenue. The appellant was required to segregate and reverse the credit attributable to trading activities. The extended period of limitation was deemed applicable due to the appellant&#039;s awareness and actions regarding non-taxable trading activities, justifying the proportionate turnover method for calculating credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364371</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>