<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 1655 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364347</link>
    <description>Delay in filing the review petitions was condoned, but the SC found no error, much less any apparent error, in the judgment under review. On that basis, the review petitions arising from the earlier civil appeals were dismissed, leaving the prior decision undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2018 05:21:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=528388" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 1655 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364347</link>
      <description>Delay in filing the review petitions was condoned, but the SC found no error, much less any apparent error, in the judgment under review. On that basis, the review petitions arising from the earlier civil appeals were dismissed, leaving the prior decision undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364347</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>