<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 1650 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364342</link>
    <description>A special leave petition in a customs matter was dismissed as infructuous because, on the admitted position, the customs authorities had already passed an order pursuant to the impugned order. The Supreme Court therefore did not proceed to examine the merits and disposed of the petition on the ground that no live controversy remained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2018 05:21:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=528383" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 1650 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364342</link>
      <description>A special leave petition in a customs matter was dismissed as infructuous because, on the admitted position, the customs authorities had already passed an order pursuant to the impugned order. The Supreme Court therefore did not proceed to examine the merits and disposed of the petition on the ground that no live controversy remained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364342</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>