<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 1644 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364336</link>
    <description>Delay was condoned, but the Supreme Court found no error in the impugned order and held that no case for review was made out, so the review petition was dismissed. The order therefore left the earlier decision undisturbed and declined to reopen the matter on review.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2018 05:21:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=528377" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 1644 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364336</link>
      <description>Delay was condoned, but the Supreme Court found no error in the impugned order and held that no case for review was made out, so the review petition was dismissed. The order therefore left the earlier decision undisturbed and declined to reopen the matter on review.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364336</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>