<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (9) TMI 590 - HIGH COURT COURT OF BOMBAY AT NAGPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274062</link>
    <description>The appellate court overturned the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The accused was convicted and sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 10,000 and compensation of Rs. 2,82,000. The court found that the accused failed to effectively rebut the statutory presumptions, leading to the conviction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2018 16:33:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=528351" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (9) TMI 590 - HIGH COURT COURT OF BOMBAY AT NAGPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274062</link>
      <description>The appellate court overturned the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The accused was convicted and sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 10,000 and compensation of Rs. 2,82,000. The court found that the accused failed to effectively rebut the statutory presumptions, leading to the conviction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274062</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>