https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274060 The High Court upheld the decision of the Single Judge directing the return of the plaint for lack of jurisdiction of the Delhi Court in a suit for recovery of dues and interest. The Court considered factors such as the location of parties, issuance of cheques, and place of cause of action, concluding that no part of the cause of action arose in Delhi. Despite the appellant's arguments based on terms of sale and cheque presentation in Delhi, the High Court found that jurisdiction was lacking. The appeal was dismissed, emphasizing that jurisdiction cannot be derived solely from parties' agreement. en-us Fri, 18 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 26 Jul 2018 15:31:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274060 The High Court upheld the decision of the Single Judge directing the return of the plaint for lack of jurisdiction of the Delhi Court in a suit for recovery of dues and interest. The Court considered factors such as the location of parties, issuance of cheques, and place of cause of action, concluding that no part of the cause of action arose in Delhi. Despite the appellant's arguments based on terms of sale and cheque presentation in Delhi, the High Court found that jurisdiction was lacking. The appeal was dismissed, emphasizing that jurisdiction cannot be derived solely from parties' agreement. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 18 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274060