https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274059 The Delhi High Court lacked jurisdiction to try a suit for recovery of Rs. 1,25,55,000 filed by the appellants-plaintiffs. The court held that the cause of action did not sufficiently arise in Delhi as the cheque presentation and dishonour occurred elsewhere. Despite appellant arguments citing precedents, the court dismissed the appeal, affirming the lack of territorial jurisdiction and ordering the return of the plaint to the appellants. en-us Mon, 14 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 26 Jul 2018 15:18:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274059 The Delhi High Court lacked jurisdiction to try a suit for recovery of Rs. 1,25,55,000 filed by the appellants-plaintiffs. The court held that the cause of action did not sufficiently arise in Delhi as the cheque presentation and dishonour occurred elsewhere. Despite appellant arguments citing precedents, the court dismissed the appeal, affirming the lack of territorial jurisdiction and ordering the return of the plaint to the appellants. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 14 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274059