<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (10) TMI 750 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274058</link>
    <description>Binding precedent governed the appeal: the Supreme Court held that it was bound by its earlier decision in Collector of Central Excise, Pune v. Dai Ichi Karkaria Ltd. and therefore dismissed the present appeal as unsustainable. The Court applied the ratio decidendi of the prior authority and did not state any new or independent legal principle. The matter was resolved entirely by stare decisis, with no separate adjudication on the merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2018 14:56:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=528340" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (10) TMI 750 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274058</link>
      <description>Binding precedent governed the appeal: the Supreme Court held that it was bound by its earlier decision in Collector of Central Excise, Pune v. Dai Ichi Karkaria Ltd. and therefore dismissed the present appeal as unsustainable. The Court applied the ratio decidendi of the prior authority and did not state any new or independent legal principle. The matter was resolved entirely by stare decisis, with no separate adjudication on the merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274058</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>