<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Directors Not Liable for Cheque Dishonor Without Signature u/s 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=40524</link>
    <description>Dishonor of cheque due to insufficiency of funds - Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - The petitioners are not stated to be signatories to the cheques in question. They cannot be roped in merely because they have been directors of the company accused.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2018 11:41:46 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2018 11:41:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=528331" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Directors Not Liable for Cheque Dishonor Without Signature u/s 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=40524</link>
      <description>Dishonor of cheque due to insufficiency of funds - Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - The petitioners are not stated to be signatories to the cheques in question. They cannot be roped in merely because they have been directors of the company accused.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2018 11:41:46 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=40524</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>