<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Case Highlights Importance of Allowing Cross-Examination on Purchaser Statements for Demand Quantification.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=40520</link>
    <description>This is a case where entire quantification of demand is based on the statements of the purchaser the request for cross examination of the persons tendering the statements should have been allowed, in case the same is not allowed or possible, at least reasons thereof should have been recorded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2018 09:41:15 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2018 09:41:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=528323" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Case Highlights Importance of Allowing Cross-Examination on Purchaser Statements for Demand Quantification.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=40520</link>
      <description>This is a case where entire quantification of demand is based on the statements of the purchaser the request for cross examination of the persons tendering the statements should have been allowed, in case the same is not allowed or possible, at least reasons thereof should have been recorded.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2018 09:41:15 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=40520</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>