<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 1630 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364322</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the decisions of the Tribunal in both the assessee&#039;s and Revenue&#039;s appeals, emphasizing the consistent application of exemptions and deductions under the Income Tax Act. The assessee&#039;s claim for exemption under Annexure-A notification was denied, as the High Court held that the exemption provided under other Acts did not apply due to the absence of a non obstante clause in the FTDR Act. Additionally, the exclusion of reimbursed expenses from the total turnover under Section 10A of the IT Act was upheld to maintain consistency and prevent unjust outcomes, as ruled in previous cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2018 08:55:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=528311" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 1630 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364322</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the decisions of the Tribunal in both the assessee&#039;s and Revenue&#039;s appeals, emphasizing the consistent application of exemptions and deductions under the Income Tax Act. The assessee&#039;s claim for exemption under Annexure-A notification was denied, as the High Court held that the exemption provided under other Acts did not apply due to the absence of a non obstante clause in the FTDR Act. Additionally, the exclusion of reimbursed expenses from the total turnover under Section 10A of the IT Act was upheld to maintain consistency and prevent unjust outcomes, as ruled in previous cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364322</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>