<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 1623 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364315</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the attachment of property under the Income Tax Act, directing the petitioner to follow the prescribed procedure under Rule 11 of the 2nd Schedule for addressing such disputes. The judgment emphasized the need to adhere to statutory provisions and utilize remedies provided under the law for resolving tax recovery and property attachment issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2018 08:54:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=528304" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 1623 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364315</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the attachment of property under the Income Tax Act, directing the petitioner to follow the prescribed procedure under Rule 11 of the 2nd Schedule for addressing such disputes. The judgment emphasized the need to adhere to statutory provisions and utilize remedies provided under the law for resolving tax recovery and property attachment issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364315</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>