<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 1610 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364302</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 8.75 crores, ruling that the preference shares were capital receipts and not taxable as business income under Section 28(iv) of the Income Tax Act. The judgment emphasized legal provisions and judicial precedents supporting the classification of the preference shares as capital receipts, ultimately dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2018 08:54:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=528291" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 1610 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364302</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 8.75 crores, ruling that the preference shares were capital receipts and not taxable as business income under Section 28(iv) of the Income Tax Act. The judgment emphasized legal provisions and judicial precedents supporting the classification of the preference shares as capital receipts, ultimately dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364302</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>