https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364300 The Court acknowledged delays in receiving the order from Customs Authority, leading to the rejection of the belated appeal by CESTAT. Despite laxity on both sides, the Court directed the appellant to deposit a specified amount for appeal revival. The Court recognized the appellant's efforts in seeking the order and the relevance of evidence from a previous successful appeal before the Supreme Court. The appeal was allowed, remitted to CESTAT for a fair hearing, and further proceedings in accordance with the law. en-us Tue, 24 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 05 Mar 2019 10:42:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364300 The Court acknowledged delays in receiving the order from Customs Authority, leading to the rejection of the belated appeal by CESTAT. Despite laxity on both sides, the Court directed the appellant to deposit a specified amount for appeal revival. The Court recognized the appellant's efforts in seeking the order and the relevance of evidence from a previous successful appeal before the Supreme Court. The appeal was allowed, remitted to CESTAT for a fair hearing, and further proceedings in accordance with the law. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 24 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364300