<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 1605 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364297</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, emphasizing that the appellant had complied with project import regulations by registering the contract before clearing the goods, not before importation. The Tribunal found no violation of project import benefit, setting aside the lower authority&#039;s decision and highlighting the correct interpretation of the regulations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Jun 2019 11:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=528286" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 1605 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364297</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, emphasizing that the appellant had complied with project import regulations by registering the contract before clearing the goods, not before importation. The Tribunal found no violation of project import benefit, setting aside the lower authority&#039;s decision and highlighting the correct interpretation of the regulations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364297</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>