<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 1599 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364291</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal against the demand of Service Tax and penalty, setting aside the impugned order and remanding the matter to the Commissioner (Appeals) for reconsideration. The Tribunal found discrepancies in the treatment of income and Service Tax payments by the appellant, directing the Commissioner (Appeals) to address all grounds raised in the appeal memorandum for a fresh decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2018 08:53:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=528280" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 1599 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364291</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal against the demand of Service Tax and penalty, setting aside the impugned order and remanding the matter to the Commissioner (Appeals) for reconsideration. The Tribunal found discrepancies in the treatment of income and Service Tax payments by the appellant, directing the Commissioner (Appeals) to address all grounds raised in the appeal memorandum for a fresh decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364291</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>