<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 1588 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364280</link>
    <description>Valuation of paints used in contract painting work was examined under the Central Excise Valuation Rules, including whether labour charges had to be deducted from the contract value under Rule 11 or whether Rule 8 applied. Following its earlier rulings in the assessee&#039;s own case for prior periods, the Tribunal held that the demand arose from the valuation method adopted by the assessee and that the duty liability and consequential interest were maintainable. However, applying the same precedent, it set aside the penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2018 08:52:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=528269" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 1588 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364280</link>
      <description>Valuation of paints used in contract painting work was examined under the Central Excise Valuation Rules, including whether labour charges had to be deducted from the contract value under Rule 11 or whether Rule 8 applied. Following its earlier rulings in the assessee&#039;s own case for prior periods, the Tribunal held that the demand arose from the valuation method adopted by the assessee and that the duty liability and consequential interest were maintainable. However, applying the same precedent, it set aside the penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364280</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>