<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 1585 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364277</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the appellant concerning the recovery of CENVAT Credit on GTA service for the transportation of iron ore and coal fines. The Tribunal held that the iron ore fines and coal fines were waste products and not used in the manufacturing process, thus not qualifying as inputs under Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. Additionally, the Tribunal clarified that Rule 3(5) does not cover CENVAT credit on input services, ruling in favor of the appellant based on statutory provisions and legal precedents. The impugned order was set aside, and consequential relief was granted to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2018 09:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=528266" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 1585 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364277</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the appellant concerning the recovery of CENVAT Credit on GTA service for the transportation of iron ore and coal fines. The Tribunal held that the iron ore fines and coal fines were waste products and not used in the manufacturing process, thus not qualifying as inputs under Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. Additionally, the Tribunal clarified that Rule 3(5) does not cover CENVAT credit on input services, ruling in favor of the appellant based on statutory provisions and legal precedents. The impugned order was set aside, and consequential relief was granted to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364277</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>