<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 1569 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364261</link>
    <description>An application under a settlement scheme cannot be rejected for alleged short payment without verification of the particulars furnished, notice to the applicant, and a fair opportunity to cure any deficit where the rules permit. Where the application remained pending for an inordinate period and was rejected mechanically without a meaningful hearing or chance to explain the computation, the decision was treated as procedurally flawed and unsustainable. The rejection was set aside, and the matter was remanded for personal hearing, consideration of the assessee&#039;s submissions, grant of reasonable time to make good any shortfall if found, and fresh finalisation under the Settlement Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2018 08:51:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=528250" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 1569 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364261</link>
      <description>An application under a settlement scheme cannot be rejected for alleged short payment without verification of the particulars furnished, notice to the applicant, and a fair opportunity to cure any deficit where the rules permit. Where the application remained pending for an inordinate period and was rejected mechanically without a meaningful hearing or chance to explain the computation, the decision was treated as procedurally flawed and unsustainable. The rejection was set aside, and the matter was remanded for personal hearing, consideration of the assessee&#039;s submissions, grant of reasonable time to make good any shortfall if found, and fresh finalisation under the Settlement Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364261</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>