<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (3) TMI 1308 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274043</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the assessee was not required to deduct tax at source on the commission paid to the non-resident agent for services rendered outside India. Therefore, the disallowance under section 40(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act was not justified. The appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision was overturned.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2018 08:50:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=528247" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (3) TMI 1308 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274043</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the assessee was not required to deduct tax at source on the commission paid to the non-resident agent for services rendered outside India. Therefore, the disallowance under section 40(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act was not justified. The appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the Assessing Officer&#039;s decision was overturned.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274043</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>