https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274039 The court allowed the criminal revision petition, setting aside the conviction of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The judgment held that the undated cheque filled after a significant period was not legally maintainable, and the dishonour did not establish criminal liability. The court ordered the refund of the deposited amount to the accused, emphasizing that filling an undated cheque after a considerable time does not lead to criminal liability under the Act. en-us Thu, 23 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Jul 2018 17:34:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274039 The court allowed the criminal revision petition, setting aside the conviction of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The judgment held that the undated cheque filled after a significant period was not legally maintainable, and the dishonour did not establish criminal liability. The court ordered the refund of the deposited amount to the accused, emphasizing that filling an undated cheque after a considerable time does not lead to criminal liability under the Act. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 23 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274039