<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (2) TMI 691 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274038</link>
    <description>In a summary suit, stale cheques not presented within their validity period can raise a triable issue because the claim must rest on an enforceable liability. Adding dates to undated cheques may also amount to material alteration under the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, unless it is shown to reflect the parties&#039; common intention or consent. On the pleaded facts, the absence of clear consent made the cheques&#039; validity a matter for trial, supporting the defendant&#039;s right to defend unconditionally.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2018 17:24:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=528224" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (2) TMI 691 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274038</link>
      <description>In a summary suit, stale cheques not presented within their validity period can raise a triable issue because the claim must rest on an enforceable liability. Adding dates to undated cheques may also amount to material alteration under the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, unless it is shown to reflect the parties&#039; common intention or consent. On the pleaded facts, the absence of clear consent made the cheques&#039; validity a matter for trial, supporting the defendant&#039;s right to defend unconditionally.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274038</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>