<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 1572 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274018</link>
    <description>Revenue appeals before the Tribunal were held not maintainable where the tax effect was below the prescribed monetary threshold. The applicable instruction fixed the limit for filing such appeals at Rs. 10,00,000, and the clarification relied on treated that limit as applicable not only to newly filed appeals but also to pending appeals. On that basis, the appeal was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2018 13:25:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=528216" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 1572 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274018</link>
      <description>Revenue appeals before the Tribunal were held not maintainable where the tax effect was below the prescribed monetary threshold. The applicable instruction fixed the limit for filing such appeals at Rs. 10,00,000, and the clarification relied on treated that limit as applicable not only to newly filed appeals but also to pending appeals. On that basis, the appeal was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274018</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>