<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 1563 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274032</link>
    <description>Promotion cannot be withheld under the sealed cover procedure unless suspension exists, a charge-sheet has been issued with disciplinary proceedings pending, or prosecution for a criminal charge is pending on the date the Departmental Promotion Committee considers the case. Here, the criminal case had ended in a closure report accepted by the court, no departmental proceedings had been initiated when the promotion was considered, and vigilance clearance had been granted; the proposed major penalty action remained only at the recommendation stage. On that basis, denial of promotion was unjustified, and the employee was held entitled to promotion with consequential reliefs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2018 13:25:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=528202" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 1563 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274032</link>
      <description>Promotion cannot be withheld under the sealed cover procedure unless suspension exists, a charge-sheet has been issued with disciplinary proceedings pending, or prosecution for a criminal charge is pending on the date the Departmental Promotion Committee considers the case. Here, the criminal case had ended in a closure report accepted by the court, no departmental proceedings had been initiated when the promotion was considered, and vigilance clearance had been granted; the proposed major penalty action remained only at the recommendation stage. On that basis, denial of promotion was unjustified, and the employee was held entitled to promotion with consequential reliefs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=274032</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>