<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 1557 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364249</link>
    <description>A primary agricultural credit society registered under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act was held entitled to deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i), because the factual basis for applying section 80P(4) and the Supreme Court ruling in Citizen Co-operative Society Ltd. was absent; the Kerala High Court view in Chirakkal Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. was followed. Interest earned from investments with sub-treasuries was also treated as part of banking operations and qualified for deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i). The society&#039;s trade-income claim was remanded for fresh consideration because the authorities had not made a clear finding on its nature or its possible coverage under section 80P(2)(a)(iv).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2018 07:47:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=528173" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 1557 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364249</link>
      <description>A primary agricultural credit society registered under the Kerala Co-operative Societies Act was held entitled to deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i), because the factual basis for applying section 80P(4) and the Supreme Court ruling in Citizen Co-operative Society Ltd. was absent; the Kerala High Court view in Chirakkal Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. was followed. Interest earned from investments with sub-treasuries was also treated as part of banking operations and qualified for deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i). The society&#039;s trade-income claim was remanded for fresh consideration because the authorities had not made a clear finding on its nature or its possible coverage under section 80P(2)(a)(iv).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364249</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>