<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 1556 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364248</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the Commissioner of Income-tax&#039;s order under section 263 was time-barred as it was not connected to the reassessment order. Since the subject matter of the revision was unrelated to the reassessment, the time limit should have commenced from the original assessment order date. Therefore, the CIT&#039;s order dated 27.03.2017 was held to be barred by limitation, and the appeal by the assessee was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2018 11:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=528172" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 1556 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364248</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the Commissioner of Income-tax&#039;s order under section 263 was time-barred as it was not connected to the reassessment order. Since the subject matter of the revision was unrelated to the reassessment, the time limit should have commenced from the original assessment order date. Therefore, the CIT&#039;s order dated 27.03.2017 was held to be barred by limitation, and the appeal by the assessee was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364248</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>