<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 1547 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364239</link>
    <description>Perpetual easementary rights were treated as valuable property rights within the wide meaning of &quot;property of any kind&quot;, so their grant was a capital asset. The irrevocable grant of a perpetual right of way and ingress and egress was held to involve relinquishment or extinguishment of rights and therefore amounted to a transfer chargeable to capital gains tax. On the facts, the full consideration was held to have accrued in the year under appeal because use of the easement began from the agreement date and the balance payment was secured by the arrangement. The appellate enhancement and taxation of the entire accrued consideration were upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2018 07:46:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=528163" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 1547 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364239</link>
      <description>Perpetual easementary rights were treated as valuable property rights within the wide meaning of &quot;property of any kind&quot;, so their grant was a capital asset. The irrevocable grant of a perpetual right of way and ingress and egress was held to involve relinquishment or extinguishment of rights and therefore amounted to a transfer chargeable to capital gains tax. On the facts, the full consideration was held to have accrued in the year under appeal because use of the easement began from the agreement date and the balance payment was secured by the arrangement. The appellate enhancement and taxation of the entire accrued consideration were upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364239</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>