<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 1545 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364237</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 1,03,00,000/- as deemed dividend under Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found that the transactions were commercial in nature and not covered by the definition of deemed dividend. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order for the assessment year 2010-11.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2018 12:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=528161" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 1545 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364237</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 1,03,00,000/- as deemed dividend under Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal found that the transactions were commercial in nature and not covered by the definition of deemed dividend. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order for the assessment year 2010-11.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364237</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>