<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (11) TMI 27 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13813</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the entitlement to weighted deduction for publicity materials but upheld the disallowance of deduction for the cost of positive prints. Additionally, the court determined that the sum representing the value of prints in transit should be treated as income for the relevant assessment year.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 10:41:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=52816" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (11) TMI 27 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13813</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the entitlement to weighted deduction for publicity materials but upheld the disallowance of deduction for the cost of positive prints. Additionally, the court determined that the sum representing the value of prints in transit should be treated as income for the relevant assessment year.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13813</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>