<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 1531 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364223</link>
    <description>The tribunal remanded the case back to the original adjudicating authority as the department failed to properly classify expenses as taxable services received in India. The demand was based on ledger entries without verifying the nature of services. The tribunal instructed a re-examination of expense classification and tax liability following principles of natural justice. Appeals were disposed of by remand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2018 07:45:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=528146" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 1531 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364223</link>
      <description>The tribunal remanded the case back to the original adjudicating authority as the department failed to properly classify expenses as taxable services received in India. The demand was based on ledger entries without verifying the nature of services. The tribunal instructed a re-examination of expense classification and tax liability following principles of natural justice. Appeals were disposed of by remand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364223</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>