<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 1524 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364216</link>
    <description>Clandestine manufacture and clearance of MS ingots could not be sustained where the accepted furnace capacity had already attained finality on earlier appellate findings and no contrary evidence of higher production capacity was produced. The Revenue&#039;s reliance on heat registers, private records, electricity consumption, and movement entries was insufficient because those materials did not displace the foundational finding on producible capacity. Once excess production was not established, the connected duty demand and consequential penalties, including those on the sister concern, also failed. The matter therefore turned on the absence of proof that the furnace could have generated the alleged quantity, making the entire demand unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2018 16:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=528139" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 1524 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364216</link>
      <description>Clandestine manufacture and clearance of MS ingots could not be sustained where the accepted furnace capacity had already attained finality on earlier appellate findings and no contrary evidence of higher production capacity was produced. The Revenue&#039;s reliance on heat registers, private records, electricity consumption, and movement entries was insufficient because those materials did not displace the foundational finding on producible capacity. Once excess production was not established, the connected duty demand and consequential penalties, including those on the sister concern, also failed. The matter therefore turned on the absence of proof that the furnace could have generated the alleged quantity, making the entire demand unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364216</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>