https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364210 A writ challenge to a rectification order was declined because an efficacious statutory appeal was available under the Act. The High Court noted that the assessing authority had considered the earlier judgment cited by the petitioner and had chosen not to apply it, but any alleged error was to be pursued before the appellate authority under Section 34 rather than in writ proceedings. The writ petition was therefore not maintainable and was liable to be dismissed. Coercive recovery steps were deferred for a limited period so the petitioner could pursue the statutory appellate remedy. en-us Wed, 27 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Jul 2018 07:44:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364210 A writ challenge to a rectification order was declined because an efficacious statutory appeal was available under the Act. The High Court noted that the assessing authority had considered the earlier judgment cited by the petitioner and had chosen not to apply it, but any alleged error was to be pursued before the appellate authority under Section 34 rather than in writ proceedings. The writ petition was therefore not maintainable and was liable to be dismissed. Coercive recovery steps were deferred for a limited period so the petitioner could pursue the statutory appellate remedy. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 27 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364210