https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364196 The Court applied its earlier precedent in Commissioner of Central Excise v. Tata Engineering and Locomotive to hold that the civil appeal was not fit for entertainment in the exercise of discretionary appellate jurisdiction. Although delay in filing was condoned, that concession did not justify admission where the governing precedent precluded it. Admission was therefore refused and the appeal dismissed. en-us Mon, 12 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Jul 2018 07:17:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364196 The Court applied its earlier precedent in Commissioner of Central Excise v. Tata Engineering and Locomotive to hold that the civil appeal was not fit for entertainment in the exercise of discretionary appellate jurisdiction. Although delay in filing was condoned, that concession did not justify admission where the governing precedent precluded it. Admission was therefore refused and the appeal dismissed. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 12 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364196