https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273998 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case concerning Service Tax liability under the reverse charge mechanism for services from foreign consultants. The demand for the period before 18-4-2006 was set aside, citing legal precedents. For the period from 18-4-2006 to December 2009, the extended period for demand was not upheld due to ongoing legal debates and confusion. While the Service Tax demand was confirmed for April 2009 to December 2009, penalties were waived considering the disputed nature of the issue. Relief was granted to the appellant for periods where demands were set aside and penalties were not imposed. en-us Thu, 01 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 14 Sep 2018 14:56:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273998 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case concerning Service Tax liability under the reverse charge mechanism for services from foreign consultants. The demand for the period before 18-4-2006 was set aside, citing legal precedents. For the period from 18-4-2006 to December 2009, the extended period for demand was not upheld due to ongoing legal debates and confusion. While the Service Tax demand was confirmed for April 2009 to December 2009, penalties were waived considering the disputed nature of the issue. Relief was granted to the appellant for periods where demands were set aside and penalties were not imposed. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 01 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273998