<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (7) TMI 76 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13804</link>
    <description>The High Court of CALCUTTA ruled in favor of the Revenue, holding that interest on loans with unexplained sources should not be allowed as a deduction. The court emphasized the importance of proper assessment and disallowing deductions on questionable transactions, even if errors occurred in the initial assessment process. The decision overturned the lower authorities&#039; allowance of interest deductions on dubious cash credits, stating that lack of explanation for loan sources did not justify interest deductions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 18:54:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=52807" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (7) TMI 76 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13804</link>
      <description>The High Court of CALCUTTA ruled in favor of the Revenue, holding that interest on loans with unexplained sources should not be allowed as a deduction. The court emphasized the importance of proper assessment and disallowing deductions on questionable transactions, even if errors occurred in the initial assessment process. The decision overturned the lower authorities&#039; allowance of interest deductions on dubious cash credits, stating that lack of explanation for loan sources did not justify interest deductions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=13804</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>