<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 1484 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364176</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition, emphasizing the importance of exhausting statutory remedies before seeking judicial intervention. It held that the petitioner must first utilize available appellate remedies, such as appealing to the Disputes Resolution Panel and the ITAT, before approaching the court under Article 226. The court underscored the need to respect the separation of powers and avoid unnecessary judicial interference in the functions of statutory authorities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2018 17:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=528045" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 1484 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364176</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition, emphasizing the importance of exhausting statutory remedies before seeking judicial intervention. It held that the petitioner must first utilize available appellate remedies, such as appealing to the Disputes Resolution Panel and the ITAT, before approaching the court under Article 226. The court underscored the need to respect the separation of powers and avoid unnecessary judicial interference in the functions of statutory authorities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364176</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>