<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 1469 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364161</link>
    <description>The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the CIT (A)&#039;s order for the Assessment Year 2011-12, regarding disallowances under sections 14A and 35D. The decision was based on legal provisions and court rulings, emphasizing that disallowance under section 14A cannot be made if no exempt income was earned, and allowing the deduction claimed under section 35D for preliminary expenses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2018 08:51:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=528026" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 1469 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364161</link>
      <description>The ITAT dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and upheld the CIT (A)&#039;s order for the Assessment Year 2011-12, regarding disallowances under sections 14A and 35D. The decision was based on legal provisions and court rulings, emphasizing that disallowance under section 14A cannot be made if no exempt income was earned, and allowing the deduction claimed under section 35D for preliminary expenses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364161</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>