<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 1459 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364151</link>
    <description>Tax effect below the monetary limit prescribed in Circular No. 3/2018 led the Supreme Court to decline interference with the High Court&#039;s order. The Court condoned delay, but found no basis to entertain the special leave petition because the disputed tax effect was below the threshold. The petition was dismissed, and pending applications were disposed of.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2018 08:51:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=528014" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 1459 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364151</link>
      <description>Tax effect below the monetary limit prescribed in Circular No. 3/2018 led the Supreme Court to decline interference with the High Court&#039;s order. The Court condoned delay, but found no basis to entertain the special leave petition because the disputed tax effect was below the threshold. The petition was dismissed, and pending applications were disposed of.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364151</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>