<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 1446 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364138</link>
    <description>The court quashed the orders of the Adjudicating Authority and the Appellate Authority, allowing the appeal in favor of the assessee. The decision was based on the lack of proper classification under the relevant clause for service tax assessment on the commission received from the broker. The court emphasized the importance of clarity in classification for tax purposes and highlighted that the appellant&#039;s activities did not align with the requirements for business auxiliary services. The judgment provided a detailed analysis of the issues, referencing previous cases and legal provisions to support the conclusion that the appellant was not liable for the service tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2018 14:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=528001" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 1446 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364138</link>
      <description>The court quashed the orders of the Adjudicating Authority and the Appellate Authority, allowing the appeal in favor of the assessee. The decision was based on the lack of proper classification under the relevant clause for service tax assessment on the commission received from the broker. The court emphasized the importance of clarity in classification for tax purposes and highlighted that the appellant&#039;s activities did not align with the requirements for business auxiliary services. The judgment provided a detailed analysis of the issues, referencing previous cases and legal provisions to support the conclusion that the appellant was not liable for the service tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364138</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>