<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (4) TMI 743 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273995</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court interpreted a circular letter dated 21.01.1993 concerning the promotion of a government servant with pending disciplinary proceedings. The respondent, eligible for promotion to the Senior Administrative Grade, faced a sealed cover procedure due to a vigilance case. The Court ruled that promotion consideration is a fundamental right and should adhere to rules. The circular&#039;s sealed cover procedure should only apply under specific conditions, not met in this case. Previous cases were distinguished, and the appeal was dismissed, affirming the lower courts&#039; judgments and clarifying the proper application of circular guidelines in such situations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2018 17:50:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=527971" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (4) TMI 743 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273995</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court interpreted a circular letter dated 21.01.1993 concerning the promotion of a government servant with pending disciplinary proceedings. The respondent, eligible for promotion to the Senior Administrative Grade, faced a sealed cover procedure due to a vigilance case. The Court ruled that promotion consideration is a fundamental right and should adhere to rules. The circular&#039;s sealed cover procedure should only apply under specific conditions, not met in this case. Previous cases were distinguished, and the appeal was dismissed, affirming the lower courts&#039; judgments and clarifying the proper application of circular guidelines in such situations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273995</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>