<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (3) TMI 1101 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273993</link>
    <description>The Bihar reservation statute, on its express wording, extended to the State&#039;s judicial service because &quot;State&quot; included the Judiciary and the reservation scheme applied to appointments in an establishment by direct recruitment. However, Articles 233 and 234 were treated as a complete constitutional code for recruitment to the District Judiciary and Subordinate Judiciary, so a legislative quota could not bypass the High Court&#039;s consultative role or the constitutional appointment process. Section 4 was therefore read down to exclude judicial appointments, while it continued to operate for other State services. The judicial appointments were to proceed under the governing judicial service rules.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2018 16:20:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=527969" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (3) TMI 1101 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273993</link>
      <description>The Bihar reservation statute, on its express wording, extended to the State&#039;s judicial service because &quot;State&quot; included the Judiciary and the reservation scheme applied to appointments in an establishment by direct recruitment. However, Articles 233 and 234 were treated as a complete constitutional code for recruitment to the District Judiciary and Subordinate Judiciary, so a legislative quota could not bypass the High Court&#039;s consultative role or the constitutional appointment process. Section 4 was therefore read down to exclude judicial appointments, while it continued to operate for other State services. The judicial appointments were to proceed under the governing judicial service rules.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273993</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>