https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273992 Promotion recommendation was treated as conditional rather than actual promotion, because in service law promotion is complete only when the employee is posted to the promoted post and assumes charge. On these facts, the disciplinary proceedings had already been initiated and were pending before actual posting, so the employer was justified in withholding the posting order and applying the sealed cover procedure. Earlier Supreme Court authorities were found inapplicable because the employee had not been completely exonerated and the departmental process was already in motion. The employee therefore had no enforceable right to insist on posting or consequential benefits before joining the promoted post. en-us Thu, 31 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 23 Jul 2018 16:02:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273992 Promotion recommendation was treated as conditional rather than actual promotion, because in service law promotion is complete only when the employee is posted to the promoted post and assumes charge. On these facts, the disciplinary proceedings had already been initiated and were pending before actual posting, so the employer was justified in withholding the posting order and applying the sealed cover procedure. Earlier Supreme Court authorities were found inapplicable because the employee had not been completely exonerated and the departmental process was already in motion. The employee therefore had no enforceable right to insist on posting or consequential benefits before joining the promoted post. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 31 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273992