https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273988 A hoarding erected on public premises was treated as a movable structure because it could be removed without injury to the land or the structure, even though fixed on iron pillars and set up for a limited period. Under the special statutory scheme, movable structures or fixtures may be removed without prior notice, and the requirement of natural justice does not override that express procedure. The High Court also noted that rival claims to title could not be finally decided in writ proceedings under Article 226, and mandamus or compensation could not be granted on that basis. The removal without notice was therefore lawful and the writ relief was declined. en-us Fri, 08 Jul 1994 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 23 Jul 2018 14:58:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273988 A hoarding erected on public premises was treated as a movable structure because it could be removed without injury to the land or the structure, even though fixed on iron pillars and set up for a limited period. Under the special statutory scheme, movable structures or fixtures may be removed without prior notice, and the requirement of natural justice does not override that express procedure. The High Court also noted that rival claims to title could not be finally decided in writ proceedings under Article 226, and mandamus or compensation could not be granted on that basis. The removal without notice was therefore lawful and the writ relief was declined. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 08 Jul 1994 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=273988