<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (7) TMI 1411 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364103</link>
    <description>The CBDT stay-of-demand norm prescribing a 15% deposit of the disputed tax demand is only a general guideline, not an inflexible rule, and the assessing authority and administrative Commissioner may vary it where the facts justify a different approach. Where the demand is high, the appeal is at the first appellate stage, and the additions appear arguable, insisting on the full deposit may be unduly onerous. On those facts, the deposit condition was modified and reduced to 7.5%, with immovable security required for the balance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2018 17:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=527930" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (7) TMI 1411 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364103</link>
      <description>The CBDT stay-of-demand norm prescribing a 15% deposit of the disputed tax demand is only a general guideline, not an inflexible rule, and the assessing authority and administrative Commissioner may vary it where the facts justify a different approach. Where the demand is high, the appeal is at the first appellate stage, and the additions appear arguable, insisting on the full deposit may be unduly onerous. On those facts, the deposit condition was modified and reduced to 7.5%, with immovable security required for the balance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=364103</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>